See Jet Consulting Services/Computer Support website at:
Tuesday, June 20, 2017
Mindmapping - are you a fan?
Are you a fan of mindmapping? If not, you might like to do a little research about using mindmapping and the advantages. If so, checkout https://www.facebook.com/SimTechMindMapper/ software.
Thursday, June 15, 2017
Documentation: Expect the unexpected... are you prepared?
Documentation
Yes
|
No
|
These questions help evaluate
your existing documentation
|
☐
|
☐
|
Are the duties of your key employees documented?
Often key
staff don’t take the time to document important functions.
|
☐
|
☐
|
Is the documentation up-to-date?
During
transition, often employees are too busy to document changes.
|
☐
|
☐
|
Does your team adhere to the organization documentation?
|
☐
|
☐
|
Can you quickly locate critical documentation/instructions for
important agency functions?
|
☐
|
☐
|
Is there a checklist of important work, including the frequency each
task shall be performed?
|
☐
|
☐
|
Do you have access to critical logins and passwords, and do multiple employees
have access to needed sites, programs, functions?
|
☐
|
☐
|
Have you been reluctant to let a staff go because the job
responsibilities are not documented adequately?
We have
been asked to assist when key staff have required an
unexpected
extended leave, or when key staff have been let go.
Documentation of the
duties was incomplete and inadequate.
|
☐
|
☐
|
Does your documentation meet auditor expectations?
If every
agency was as accurate as they think,
auditing
would be unnecessary.
Auditor
quote: “If it’s not documented, it
doesn’t count.”
|
☐
|
☐
|
Have you recently experienced a corrective action plan related to
documentation or internal procedures?
|
Do you have written instructions for:
☐ IT ☐ Admin
☐ Accounting ☐ Medical
Records
☐ Front
Desk/Support Staff ☐ Clinical
|
||
☐
|
☐
|
Would your organization find a professional
review of documents and procedures helpful?
Would you like assistance with documenting key functions or preparing
for/responding to audits?
|
Tuesday, June 13, 2017
Business Continuity and Disaster Planning: Are you Prepared?
Business Continuity: Are you Prepared?
Yes
|
No
|
These
questions provide a guide for evaluating your existing disaster recovery plan
|
|
☐
|
☐
|
Does your
agency/office have a disaster recovery plan?
Has it been updated/reviewed in the last year (six months)?
|
|
☐
|
☐
|
Is the plan
published and distributed to all staff? Are employees familiar with your
disaster recovery plan?
|
|
☐
|
☐
|
Is the plan
practiced/tested? How frequently?
☐ Annual ☐ 2x/year ☐ 3x/year
☐ Not Tested ☐ Other
_____________________________
We recommend some tests at
night and some on weekends.
|
|
☐
|
☐
|
Does your plan
include/involve the entire organization? Is there a plan specific for each
unit/department in your agency?
|
|
☐
|
☐
|
Does your plan
prioritize the safety of all staff?
|
|
☐
|
☐
|
Is your critical
data stored at multiple locations?
|
|
☐
|
☐
|
Are the
appointments/schedules for each employee stored on more than one
computer/available if the main system is down?
|
|
☐
|
☐
|
Does your plan
include external sources for recovery tasks (data storage, paper reclamation,
etc.)?
|
|
☐
|
☐
|
Does your plan
assign key duties to the appropriate personnel (security, publicity, data
recovery, payroll, operations)?
|
|
☐
|
☐
|
Does your plan
include a telephone calling chain?
|
|
☐
|
☐
|
Does your plan
include a regular review of personnel contact and address information?
|
|
☐
|
☐
|
Does your plan
identify and properly prioritize mission-critical functions to quickly resume
operation?
|
|
☐
|
☐
|
Does your plan
cover/account for the following disasters?
☐ Severe weather (tornados,
hurricanes, storms)
☐ Loss of all computing capabilities ☐ Threat
of Violence / Terrorism
☐ Loss of access to the building ☐ Theft/Vandalism
☐ Key Staff Unavailable Can you locate logins/passwords?
|
|
☐
|
☐
|
Does your
organization have a disaster recovery planning/review committee?
|
|
☐
|
☐
|
Would
your organization like a disaster recovery planning review, or assistance
with your disaster recovery plan?
|
|
Friday, June 9, 2017
We're "official"! WOB Certified
We’re “official”!
There are many reasons to do business with Jet Computer Support. We have staff with a wealth of expertise in
their field, we offer affordable rates, and we're known for our fantastic
customer service. But now there’s another great reason to work with Jet
Computer Support. We have always been a woman-owned business since our founding
23 years ago, but now it’s official! We have gone through the formal process
and have been certified by both Washington and Oregon as a woman-owned small
business. While this isn’t a factor for many of our customers, it can be a benefit
for some government agencies to experience our excellent services while meeting
requirements and goals for supporting small and woman-owned businesses. Our WOB certification with the federal
government makes us not only a small business but a micro business at the federal
level.
If you need our certification numbers for your records to help your
organization demonstrate our woman-owned business status, our certification
numbers are below.
Washington certification # W2F0024449
Oregon certification #10513
Monday, January 9, 2017
Jacob Morgan - The Future of Work
How many are closer to this model now than they were in 2013?
Our Collabosphere keynote speaker Jacob Morgan + Chess Media Group take a look at the future of work.
Tuesday, July 26, 2016
Jet Computer Support: Some of Our Specialties
Jet Computer Support has been helping
businesses, non-profits, and government entities for more than 20 years. We offer
professional services in computer systems, electronic health records and technology.
Some of our specialties include:
·
Systems implementation
|
·
Data entry
|
·
Data warehouse
|
·
General support
|
·
Programming
|
·
Help desk
|
·
Project management
|
·
Documentation
|
·
Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
planning
|
·
IT department and staff management/supervision
|
·
Electronic health record: purchase,
implementation, and modification
|
·
Data import and export for contract
requirements
|
·
Development of management reports
|
·
Training
|
Business Types:
|
||
Woman Owned Business
|
||
Woman Owned Small Business
|
||
WBE Certification –
#W2F0024449
|
||
DUNS:
|
029866048
|
CAGE:
|
7KR01
|
EIN:
|
91-1697228
|
Thursday, July 21, 2016
Super Script - Conditional Changes to DST (data elements) Values using uScript for Netsmart MIS/EHR
Super Script – Netsmart MIS/EHR Conditional Changes to Data (DST) Values
The Super Script that we developed and use regularly for Netsmart (previously CMHC) MIS/EHR allows changes to the Netsmart MIS database(s) when one or multiple data elements must be changed based on specific criteria.
Script behavior:
Ø The super script is used to
update both record and stand-alone DSTs (data elements) using conditional
logic.
Ø The script can make changes either
to a list of registers or to all registers in a database.
Ø The script produces two files in
the print queue: One file contains the
logic used to determine when a change to the database should be made and the
other shows changes that were made and to which registers.
Ø Both stand-alone DSTs as well as
record DSTs can be updated.
Ø DSTs values can be copied from
one database to another (databases must be linked with a DST containing a
register ID).
Ø When updating DSTs the script can
link from one database to another so that changes can be coordinated between
databases. This functionality is sometimes used to make changes to claims,
ISNs, and events simultaneously.
The script
can make multiple updates from one set of conditions, or multiple updates from
multiple sets of conditions. In other
words, the script can update multiple DSTs (data elements) from one set of
conditions, or multiple sets of DSTs (data elements) from multiple sets of
conditions. For example:
Multiple DSTs from one set of
conditions:
For all clients:
If C.STATE = "OR" and C.ZIP = "97217" then set
C.COUNTY to a value of "1" (Multnomah)
Multiple DSTs being updated from
multiple sets of conditions:
For all clients:
If C.STATE = "OR" and C.ZIP = "97217" then set
C.COUNTY to a value of "1"
(Multnomah)
If C.STATE = "WA" and C.ZIP = "98001" then set
C.COUNTY to a value of "17" (King)
Use the superscript to:
Ø Update database record layers
based on multiple DST values within a record.
Ø Coordinate updates between
claims, ISNs, and events with the same changes at the same time.
Ø Update stand-alone DSTs based on
the specific values of other DSTs.
Ø Simultaneously make multiple
changes to data based on multiple conditions sets.
Ø Delete record layers based on the
DST values within the record.
Limitations:
Ø The current super script cannot
add DST layers. It can only change existing data or remove data.
Ø The script only accesses one
record layer per update. You cannot use the data in one record to determine if
another separate record is to be updated.
Possible additional script features:
Ø A feature can be added to allow
for undoing DST changes after they are made.
Ø Recode tables can be integrated
into the script as a means of specifying the changes to be made.
Ø A modification could be made to
the script to allow for the adding of data layers.
Wednesday, July 20, 2016
How We Solved It:
Customer issue:
|
A multi-county government entity needed to convert their legacy
mental health Management Information System (MIS) from a HIPAA clearinghouse
model paying their contracted agencies a capitated rate or cost based (i.e.
not requiring HIPAA standard transactions), to a fee-for-service model using
a browser based MIS interface and requiring HIPAA standard transactions from
their contracted agencies.
|
How we solved it:
|
This was a huge undertaking that required much coordination, project
management, attention to detail, with industry knowledge and expertise. In
addition to creating scripts to import/export HIPAA standard transactions[1] that
involved programming for complicated rules for data allowed/not allowed, we
also created fully customized screens in their browser-based MIS that enforced
entry edits to ensure accurate data.
We were able to successfully complete all aspects of this project on
time and within budget.
|
[1]
HIPAA 837P Outpatient Claims, 270 Eligibility Inquiry (submission), 271
Eligibility Inquiry (results), 834 Eligibility from Payer, 820 Payments
Wednesday, July 6, 2016
Avoid Phishing
Thank you to Intermedia for this helpful article on Phishing. I read their blog entry and wanted to pass this article along. I have copied their main points below:
- Be aware of email requests with high urgency that ask you to take quick action. Phishers often prey on employee trust and will spoof executives to get you to comply with high urgency actions like wiring large amounts of money ASAP. Or in my case, losing my matching benefits if I didn’t immediately comply. As a rule of thumb, if you are ever in doubt, double-check the request with the sender either by phone or by composing a new email—never reply to the email itself.
- Never give sensitive personal or financial information over email. Trusted parties will never ask you for personal or financial information through email (e.g., social security numbers, account numbers, credit card numbers, passwords, etc.). Be cautious of emails that ask you to call a phone number to update your account information as well.
- If an offer seems too good to be true, it probably is. Offers ofbig bonuses, large payments or gifts (e.g., win a free iPad) are ways attackers try to get inside your head. If the promise is “too good to be true,” do some research into the individual or company before taking action.
- Think about whether you initiated the action. Phishers will try to spoof well-known companies to have you reset your password, update your account or track a shipment. Always be suspicious of unsolicited email, if you didn’t prompt a password reset — don’t click the link.
I have been grateful that many Phishing scams seem very obvious. This article describes a tricky scenario that wasn't so apparent and reminds each of us to be cautious and always alert.
Wednesday, June 1, 2016
First Agency to Meet Greater Columbia BHO Data Requirements
We at Jet Computer Support are happy to report we have helped a Greater Columbia contracted agency to become the first to meet new data requirements for Greater Columbia BHO. Great job team!
Monday, March 7, 2016
IRMS File Extraction Script in the Netsmart MIS/EHR
IRMS File Extraction Script in
the Netsmart MIS/EHR
Script behavior:
1)
All
documents in the IRMS are exported as separate files.
2)
Documents
are exported out of the IRMS in the same format in which they were imported
(i.e., PDF files are extracted as PDF files, image files as image files, and
HTML (eCET) files as HTML files).
3)
The script
names the documents/files based on key information in either the DB13 document
database or the DBX file which contains notes, treatment plans, and MISDesigner
forms. This file name is used by the document import program to associate the
document with a database record. The script can be modified to create custom
file names based on customer specifications.
NOTE: Due
to peculiarities in the DBX file some customization will be needed before the
script can be run on a customer’s server.
4)
The script
is built for a gradual transition, meaning it tracks for itself which documents
have been exported so staff can continue adding MIS documents to the IRMS without
worry that the new documents will interfere with the file export process.
5)
The length
of time the script needs to run is dependent on the number of documents in the
IRMS. When there is a large volume of documents/files, the script could take
24+ hours to extract them all.
Script
Limitations:
1)
Signatures in
the MIS are not part of the document(s) in the IRMS. Instead, they are added to
documents dynamically in the document viewer which is why they are not able to
be included in the exported version of the document.
2)
The script
currently cannot change files formats (e.g., an image file cannot be exptracted
as or changed to a PDF file).
NOTE: It
is possible to convert files from one format to another by using a UNIX-based
file conversion program within the script. However, this process brings its own
complications and is not recommended.
Possible
additional script features:
1)
An index
file linking file names with fields is available via this script and may be
necessary for some document import systems in order to associate the document
with the new system’s EHR database.
2)
Text
containing the names of the client/staff that signed the document can be added
to HTML (eCET) documents. This is not the same as the encrypted signatures, but
is simply lines of text that can be inserted into the document that denotes who
signed it when it is viewed in the new system.
Monday, December 28, 2015
WA State BHOs: Combining Behavioral Health with Substance Use Disorder (SUD)
Washington State
has released a draft data dictionary for “native” client data and transaction
requirements that contain changes needed for the April 2016 Washington State
transition from Regional Support Networks (RSNs) providing mental health care to the new Behavioral Health
Organizations (BHOs). BHOs will administer both mental health and substance use
disorders (previously called substance abuse) funds to provide services to medically indigent
individuals and those who have a BHO-eligible Medicaid benefit. Substance Use
Disorder (SUD) providers will begin sending their data via the new data
dictionary as the TARGET system is being removed. In addition, each local BHO
may have additional changes in data and requirements.
It should also be noted that one region in Washington State, Southwest, will be an “Early Adopter” region, combining the administration of Medicaid benefits for Mental Health, Substance Use Disorder and Medical. There will be an Administrative Services Office for Southwest and many providers in that area may be contracting with the existing Apple Health Plans (such as Molina, CHPW, etc.) instead of directly with their designated region. Washington State hopes to integrate all health services in this manner beginning in 2020.
The following is a brief summary of the Data Dictionary changes to being April 1, 2016:
All existing transactions will continue but will be renumbered due to changes in the new version. Some have been renamed and new transactions—identified by bold text—have been added:
Please note that 837 changes, identified in the BHO Service Encounter Reporting Instructions (SERI) do not include structure changes but define the service (CPT and HCPCS) codes that will be allowable.
It should also be noted that one region in Washington State, Southwest, will be an “Early Adopter” region, combining the administration of Medicaid benefits for Mental Health, Substance Use Disorder and Medical. There will be an Administrative Services Office for Southwest and many providers in that area may be contracting with the existing Apple Health Plans (such as Molina, CHPW, etc.) instead of directly with their designated region. Washington State hopes to integrate all health services in this manner beginning in 2020.
The following is a brief summary of the Data Dictionary changes to being April 1, 2016:
All existing transactions will continue but will be renumbered due to changes in the new version. Some have been renamed and new transactions—identified by bold text—have been added:
- 020.06: Client Demographics
(renamed from Consumer Demographics 020.05)
- 022.01: Client Address (new/MH, SUD & Pre-intake)
- 023.01: Authorization (new/MH &
SUD)
- 030.01: ASAM Placement (new/SUD
only)
- 035.08: Client Profile
(renamed from Consumer Periodics 035.07)
- 036.01: Substance Use (new/SUD
only)
- 060.03: Program Identification
(was 060.02)
- 121.03: Co-occurring Disorder
(was 121.02)
- 130.03: Cascade Merge
(was 130.02)
- 160.03: DMHP Investigation
(was 160.02)
- 161.03: ITA Hearing (was
161.02)
- 170.02: Service Episode (was 170.01)
- RSN ID has been redefined as “BHO ID” and could
possibly be the ProviderOne ID—further State clarification is needed.
- Transactions that include a hospital or facility ID
will now require a facility National Provider Identifier (NPI). This will
replace Reporting Unit (RU) and the State will provide a list of facility
NPIs with an RU cross-walk.
- All references to Consumer have been updated to
Client.
- There are no transaction header changes.
Please note that 837 changes, identified in the BHO Service Encounter Reporting Instructions (SERI) do not include structure changes but define the service (CPT and HCPCS) codes that will be allowable.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



